How to write a history document analysis
No bribery allowed. Is the testimony sincere, exact? If the document is unsigned, what can you infer about the author or authors? Cite the document parenthetically […] giving the of the paragraph. Does it imply something different? How might the circumstances e.
Document analysis chart
You might need to regroup ideas under some themes? It is in the conclusion that you really show that you have mastered the art of document analysis Some rules to follow: Avoid excesses of language and judgement, as well as meaningless comments this is a "most interesting document" - outline instead what makes it interesting. Review the document analysis questions from above and focus on the question: What can I learn about the society that produced this document? If a man weaves a spell and puts a ban upon another man and has not justified himself, he that wove the spell upon him shall be put to death. Who is the intended audience for the document? Analyzing a document external analysis The introduction of the document : You do not have to follow exactly the sequence of issues given below. How might the editing have changed the way you perceive the document? What does the document assume that the reader already knows about the subject e.
Because justice is not simple. Sharing their analysis can also stimulate interesting discussions about the message and significance of a document.
There are always exceptions to a law or extenuating circumstances. The technique of document analysis outlined below is generally applicable to all types of documents.
He probably also created it because of confusion over the use of earlier laws, i. If the document was not published, how has it been preserved?
Analyzing historical documents answers
He probably also created it because of confusion over the use of earlier laws, i. In this way, completing document analysis forms can function as a pre-discussion activity. Why did he create a law code? Do you know or are you able to infer the effects or influences, if any, of the document? Are there assertions made that are incorrect? You will note a common theme—read critically with sensitivity to the context. Can you learn anything from the way it has been preserved? If the document represents more than one viewpoint, have you carefully distinguished between the author's viewpoint and those viewpoints the author presents only to criticize or refute? If a judge has judged a judgment, decided a decision, granted a sealed sentence, and afterwards has altered his judgment, that judge, for the alteration of the judgment that he judged, shall be put him to account, and he shall pay twelvefold the penalty which was in the said judgment, and in the assembly one shall expel him from his judgment seat, and he shall not return, and with the judges at a judgment he shall not take his seat.
Does the geographical location influence the content? For example, is an educated bureaucrat writing with third-hand knowledge of rural hunger riots?
based on 72 review