An analysis of the topic of the federal sovereignty versus rights of the states

As this cognitive dissonance increased, the people of the Northern states, and the Northern states themselves, became increasingly inclined to resist the encroachments of the slave power upon their states' rights and encroachments of the slave power by and upon the federal government of the United States.

State sovereignty

Scrutiny of dual and multiple state residencies and dual and multiple state sources of income has long been a major object of attention of all state tax departments. There are exceptions to this limitation, however, and Congress also has a limited ability to abrogate such state immunity. Thus, for instance, the Court recently held in Reno v. The soil and the people within these limits are under the political control of the Government of the United States, or of the States of the Union. Trade barriers, especially protective tariffs, were viewed as harmful to the Southern economy, which depended on exports. The Court then went on to note that in such cases "Congress was acting well within its authority to 'make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper' to 'regulate Commerce Rather, the Court held that Congress could enforce the Fourteenth Amendment by "appropriate" legislation consistent with the "letter and spirit of the constitution. Their existence was in some instances not recognized at all and their lands treated as legally "vacant" terra nullius. Constitution provides that Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the various states. The scope of the enforcement power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment also has become important in cases where the Court has found that Congress has overreached its power under other provision of the Constitution, or is limited by some provision thereof. After McCulloch, the primary legal issues in this area concerned the scope of Congress' constitutional powers, and whether the states possess certain powers to the exclusion of the federal government, even if the Constitution does not explicitly limit them to the states. The report discusses state and federal legislative power generally, and focuses on a number of these "federalism" cases. For instance, as discussed below, the expansive nature of modern Commerce Clause doctrine may actually be a reflection of Necessary and Proper Clause jurisprudence. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which became part of the Principles of '98 , along with the supporting Report of by Madison, became final documents of Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party. The Court first noted that under Seminole Tribe of Florida v.

United States, Congress had attempted to regulate in the area of low-level radioactive waste. Although the Court has not scaled back the federal government's substantive jurisdiction significantly, it has to some extent prevented the expansion of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In addition, because exempting the use of medical marijuana could undercut enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act, the Court found that the application in this case was within Congress's authority to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper" to effectuate its powers.

White[ edit ] In Texas v. The state of South Dakota, which permitted year-olds to purchase beer, brought suit arguing that the law was an invalid exercise of Congress's power under the Spending Clause to provide for the "general welfare.

Congress has broad powers over citizenship, including the power to define the circumstances under which immigrants may become citizens, 18 and to protect the rights of those persons who have citizenship. Morrison, discussed previously, the Court found that Congress, in creating a federal private right of action for victims of gender-motivated violence, had exceeded its authority under the Commerce Clause.

An analysis of the topic of the federal sovereignty versus rights of the states

Union Gas, that the Commerce Power, as a plenary power, was so broad that of necessity it required the ability to abrogate state sovereign immunity. In Alden v. Harris held that the Equal Protection Clause did not apply to an prison lynching on the basis that the Fourteenth Amendment applied only to state acts, not to individual criminal actions. Valeria Aleksandrova has provided a Polish translation of this essay on her blog. The Court relied on the principle of "tribal sovereignty," yet suggested that such sovereignty might not be inherent, but rather derived from federal power. Passed by a state convention on November 24, , it led, on December 10, to President Andrew Jackson 's proclamation against South Carolina, which sent a naval flotilla and a threat of sending federal troops to enforce the tariffs; Jackson authorized this under color of national authority, claiming in his Proclamation Regarding Nullification that "our social compact in express terms declares, that the laws of the United States, its Constitution, and treaties made under it, are the supreme law of the land" and for greater caution adds, "that the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. Filburn allowed the federal government to enforce the Agricultural Adjustment Act , providing subsidies to farmers for limiting their crop yields, arguing agriculture affected interstate commerce and came under the jurisdiction of the Commerce Clause even when a farmer grew his crops not to be sold, but for his own private use. In the case of Flores v. Consequently, most existing federal laws, which have traditionally been drafted to be consistent with this case law, 59 would survive constitutional scrutiny even under Lopez.

Until the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Constitution was limited to establishing the powers and limitations of the federal government. The Smith case held that neutral generally applicable laws may be applied to religious practices even if the law is not supported by a compelling governmental interest.

One basic controversy has been whether to trace supreme authority to the people or to a "divine right" of rulers. Sovereignty is classically defined as supreme legal authority. Scrutiny of dual and multiple state residencies and dual and multiple state sources of income has long been a major object of attention of all state tax departments.

According to this line of reasoning, the Eleventh Amendment was not an amendment, but a restoration of the original constitutional design.

state sovereignty under the constitution and articles of confederation
Rated 8/10 based on 61 review
Constitutional Logic and State Sovereignty